Project #1: Readers-Writer LocksProject OverviewThe first programming project will teach you how to use atomic operations to implement a readers-writer (multiple readers-single writer) lock. The primary goal of this assignment is to become familiar with the low-level implementation details of high-performance reader-writer locks and to learn how to use profiling tools like PERF . All the code in this programming assignment must be written in C. If you have not used C before, here's a short tutorial on the language. Even if you are familiar with C, go over this guide for additional information on writing code in the system. This is a single-person project that will be completed individually (i.e. no groups).
Implementation DetailsYou can refer to these GNU Builtin Atomics and Memory model aware atomics for a list of atomics. You can refer to this PERF examples documentation or this PERF tutorial on how to use PERF to profile the system. You can also refer to the thread-local storage concept taught in class to reduce the contention in the system. In this assignment, you will only need to modify the following file:
You will not need to make any changes to any other file in the system. You can locally modify the You will also need to write a report on how you implemented the reader-writer lock. There are two steps to implement a high-performance reader-writer lock in the DBMS:
Step #1 - Use the spin-lock to implement a single reader-single writer lockThe first step is to implement a single reader-single writer lock using a simple lock. You can test this using the bash make benchmark ./benchmark 16 2 10000 100 The arguments to the benchmark are, in order:
All arguments must be >= 1. Sample Output: Running benchmark with 16 readers, 2 writers, 10000 items, 100 iterations Threads done, stats: Readers: min 0.000016 ms, max 1.879325 ms, mean 0.008598 ms, std_dev 0.053511 Writers: min 0.000034 ms, max 0.423291 ms, mean 0.011356 ms, std_dev 0.039250 Step #2 - Extend it to implement multiple readers-single writer lockThis is the most important step. We are assuming you have successfully implemented a single reader-single writer lock. Next you need to extend it to support multiple readers using the read counter. The instructions on how to support multiple readers are provided as comments before the functions in In the multiple readers-single writer lock the priority should be given to the writer thread. That is, once a writer thread acquires the write lock it will wait for existing readers to finish but no new readers can acquire the read lock while the writer is active. InstructionsYou can download the Project #1 source code (as a Zip file) from Canvas. It is uploaded under files. You can extract the source code by uncompressing the zip file. using the following command: unzip p1.zip -d p1/ To debug any correctness issues, you can compile the make clean make D=1 main You will use the Cade cluster to finish this project. CADE manages clusters that you can use to do your development and testing for all of the class projects. You are free to use other machines and environments, but all grading will be done on these machines. Please test your solutions on these machines.
Check with CADE if you need to setup an account. CADE machines all share your home directory, so you needn't log in to the same machine each time to continue working.
After you have an account choose a machine at random from the lab status page from
the lab1- set of machines (that is,
ssh lab1-10.eng.utah.edu CADE user accounts have tcsh set as their default shell. Each time you login first run bash before anything else. All instructions, examples, and scripts from this class assume you are using bash as your shell. You'll need to do this each time unless you reset your default shell ( link) (which I'd recommend). Perhaps, savvy users can provide slick setups. This step is important. If you don't reset your shell, other things will mysteriously break as you try to work through the labs. PERF and other essential software are installed on all Cade lab1 machines. SubmissionYou need to submit a You should also include a
Make sure that We will evaluate the correctness and the performance of your implementation off-line after the project due date. Collaboration Policy
|