On this page:
wrap-expr/  c
8.15.0.5

14 Contracts for Macro Subexpressions🔗ℹ

 (require syntax/contract) package: base

This library provides a procedure wrap-expr/c for applying contracts to macro subexpressions.

procedure

(wrap-expr/c contract-expr    
  expr    
  [#:arg? arg?    
  #:positive pos-blame    
  #:negative neg-blame    
  #:name expr-name    
  #:macro macro-name    
  #:context context    
  #:phase phase])  syntax?
  contract-expr : syntax?
  expr : syntax?
  arg? : any/c = #t
  pos-blame : 
(or/c syntax? string? module-path-index?
      'from-macro 'use-site 'unknown)
   = 'from-macro
  neg-blame : 
(or/c syntax? string? module-path-index?
      'from-macro 'use-site 'unknown)
   = 'use-site
  expr-name : (or/c identifier? symbol? string? #f) = #f
  macro-name : (or/c identifier? symbol? string? #f) = #f
  context : (or/c syntax? #f) = (current-syntax-context)
  phase : exact-integer? = (syntax-local-phase-level)
Returns a syntax object representing an expression that applies the contract represented by contract-expr to the value produced by expr.

The other arguments have the same meaning as for expr/c.

Examples:
> (define-syntax (myparameterize1 stx)
    (syntax-case stx ()
      [(_ ([p v]) body)
       (with-syntax ([cp (wrap-expr/c
                          #'parameter? #'p
                          #:name "the parameter argument"
                          #:context stx)])
         #'(parameterize ([cp v]) body))]))
> (myparameterize1 ([current-input-port
                     (open-input-string "(1 2 3)")])
    (read))

'(1 2 3)

> (myparameterize1 (['whoops 'something])
    'whatever)

myparameterize1: contract violation

  expected: parameter?

  given: 'whoops

  in: parameter?

      macro argument contract on the parameter argument

  contract from: top-level

  blaming: top-level

   (assuming the contract is correct)

  at: eval:4:0

> (module mod racket
    (require (for-syntax syntax/contract))
    (define-syntax (app stx)
      (syntax-case stx ()
        [(app f arg)
         (with-syntax ([cf (wrap-expr/c
                            #'(-> number? number?)
                            #'f
                            #:name "the function argument"
                            #:context stx)])
           #'(cf arg))]))
    (provide app))
> (require 'mod)
> (app add1 5)

6

> (app add1 'apple)

app: broke its own contract

  promised: number?

  produced: 'apple

  in: the 1st argument of

      (-> number? number?)

      macro argument contract on the function argument

  contract from: 'mod

  blaming: (quote mod)

   (assuming the contract is correct)

  at: eval:8:0

> (app (lambda (x) 'pear) 5)

app: contract violation

  expected: number?

  given: 'pear

  in: the range of

      (-> number? number?)

      macro argument contract on the function argument

  contract from: 'mod

  blaming: top-level

   (assuming the contract is correct)

  at: eval:9:0

Added in version 6.3 of package base.
Changed in version 7.2.0.3: Added the #:arg? keyword argument and changed the default values and interpretation of the #:positive and #:negative arguments.
Changed in version 7.3.0.3: Added the #:phase keyword argument.